lobolance: (Default)
not 'just' art. Read the Discovery article. Going to be interesting to see where this goes.

Rob Lee: "In semasiography, the symbols do not represent speech -- such as the cartoon symbols used to show you how to build a flat pack piece of furniture -- and generally do not come in a linear manner."

Note: the posted Hadrian's Wall video on the page has nothing to do with the story. ;-)
lobolance: (Default)
I know, we're all pretty over it at this point. However, it's still Friday, and this is worth a visit, if just for the pirate keyboard picture. Fellow language geeks will enjoy a skim of the article as well.

http://158.130.17.5/~myl/languagelog/archives/002482.html
lobolance: (Default)
Two of my favorite topics (one by love, the other by necessity), discussed in a fascinating article about how language does indeed affet how we think about things.

HOW DOES OUR LANGUAGE SHAPE THE WAY WE THINK? [6.12.09]
By Lera Boroditsky


I think I snagged this originally from [livejournal.com profile] jaylake.

of particular note: "Does treating chairs as masculine and beds as feminine in the grammar make Russian speakers think of chairs as being more like men and beds as more like women in some way? It turns out that it does. In one study, we asked German and Spanish speakers to describe objects having opposite gender assignment in those two languages. The descriptions they gave differed in a way predicted by grammatical gender. For example, when asked to describe a "key" — a word that is masculine in German and feminine in Spanish — the German speakers were more likely to use words like "hard," "heavy," "jagged," "metal," "serrated," and "useful," whereas Spanish speakers were more likely to say "golden," "intricate," "little," "lovely," "shiny," and "tiny." To describe a "bridge," which is feminine in German and masculine in Spanish, the German speakers said "beautiful," "elegant," "fragile," "peaceful," "pretty," and "slender," and the Spanish speakers said "big," "dangerous," "long," "strong," "sturdy," and "towering." This was true even though all testing was done in English, a language without grammatical gender. "

Though the whole thing is fascinating (if you're a language freak), and linguistic genders are just one tasty bit.

lobolance: (My Boots)
It amazes me sometimes how many different ways the words 'conservative' and 'liberal' are used.

For example, seminarians who don't want gays in official roles in the church are called 'conservative'.

I thought conservative meant fiscally responsible and stay-out-of-others'-lives. Conservative has come to mean socially repressive... in addition to the other meanings. It really is used as a code word these days, the meaning depending on the speaker. It's interesting how much decoding one has to do. Imagine coming here from another country and not knowing the code?

Profile

lobolance: (Default)
lobolance

September 2011

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios